Researchers argue that the infrastructure surrounding an LLM, known as the harness, dictates agent performance and security but lacks a standard definition. They decompose this layer into eight comparable functional components and propose a framework to record the specific harness-model pairing used in evaluations. This documentation is critical because harness variations can cause multi-fold score discrepancies for identical models.
- Harness configuration significantly impacts reported agent scores, causing multi-fold variances for the same model.
- Proposed framework decomposes the agent harness into eight distinct, comparable functional components.
- Recording the harness-model pairing is necessary for reproducibility and accurate benchmarking.
- Existing model and agent cards fail to capture the operational infrastructure sequence, leaving security and eval gaps.